Tuesday, 29 March 2011

If it can be said...

There used to be an advert on TV for good ol' British Telecom staring Sir Bob Hoskins in which he told us “its good to talk.  And before this we had the “If it can be said, phone instead” campaign.

Back then, Sir Bob and BT were railing against such non-spoken communications technology as the telex, the electronic facsimile machine and the telegram service.  Pretty much all of these technologies have fallen by the wayside now (can you remember the last time you sent or received a fax?) but the good old telephone is still with us and people are still looking for alternatives to speaking on it.

OK, that makes you feel old doesn't it?

See while the hottest tech out there on the high street (and to an extent in business) is the cellular mobile telephone the big noise is in Smartphones, Andorid iPhone, Blackberry and Windows Phone duking it out for a rapidly expanding market.  Or a rapidly expanding niche in an existing market if you prefer.  The ability of the modern handset to make and receive voice calls is way down the list of valuable features now in this SMS, MMS, GPS, HSDPA, 3G, 4G, always on, fully connected world.  Its about app stores and about data.  Last mobile phone contract I signed I was comparing data tariff not voice minutes or SMS inclusive bundles.

Now its all Web2.0 and social media, collaboration tools, user generated content.

So I have been waiting on a new premium web domain for my latest business venture.  I have been using my registrar's website, I have been using their submission forms, I have been on forums, I have sent emails.  I have been getting nowhere.  I have been getting increasingly frustrated.  So in an act of desperation I picked up the telephone and I called them.  Admittedly I had been avoiding this method of communication because its not free, and the registrar is in the USA and I am averse to paying for international phone calls unless I really, really, have to...

Guess what, the whole matter seems to have been sorted out in like 2 minutes.  On the phone.  Sometimes it pays to go oldskool, the irony that a 100+ year old wired 1 to 1 system was necessary to sort out problems on my latest high tech system is not lost on me.

Monday, 28 March 2011

Universities showcase sustainable car technologies

West Midland vehicle technology innovators at Science Capital event in Birmingham indicated technologies from motor racing and aerospace industries could help cement future success for car building in the West Midlands.

The full story is on the UK Dept for Trade & Industry website....

Friday, 25 March 2011

New Car Connectivity Consortium

Cross industry initiative: Leading automotive mobile communications and consumer electronics companies join a new consortium for in-vehicle connectivity solutions in standards such as Terminal Mode, NFC and more.

The Car Connectivity Consortium was launched this week by eleven companies across several industries, driving global innovation for in-vehicle connectivity, including the "Terminal Mode" standard.

Founding members include vehicle manufacturers Daimler, General Motors, Honda, Hyundai Motor Company, Toyota, and Volkswagen; system suppliers Alpine and Panasonic; and consumer electronics makers LG Electronics, Nokia and Samsung.

With the Terminal Mode standard, the connection of high-performing mobile devices to vehicle-based systems opens up a host of new opportunities for business and a world of innovative applications for consumers. Mobile devices could be tightly connected with in-car systems such as digital displays, steering wheel buttons, rotary knobs and car audio systems. Consumers could use a mobile device via the car controls, as if the device and its apps were integrated into the car itself Terminal Mode is built upon a set of established standards such as Internet Protocol, Universal Serial Bus and Bluetooth.

The Car Connectivity Consortium will focus on further developing the Terminal Mode standard, address certification and branding, and start looking at new promising opportunities for the automotive environment, including NFC and wireless charging. The Car Connectivity Consortium is an open alliance focusing on cross industry contribution. It is anticipated that further leading industry players will join over the coming weeks.

The Car Connectivity Consortium will release its first specification version within the next few months. Several consortium members are expected to present their first commercial products supporting the new standard later this year.

Founding members are vehicle manufactures Daimler, General Motors, Honda, Hyundai Motor Company, Toyota, Volkswagen; system suppliers Alpine and Panasonic; and consumer electronics makers LG Electronics, Nokia and Samsung. The Car Connectivity Consortium is open for any industry member to join as a charter member, a core member or on one of two lower levels. For further information, please visit: http://www.terminalmode.org/en/agenda/consortium/

Ford's Connected Focus gets US mobile deal

Ford Motor Company and AT&T this week announced an agreement to wirelessly connect the Ford Focus Electric, Ford’s first all-electric passenger car. Announced in January at the 2011 International CES, the new Focus Electric enters production at the Michigan Assembly Plant in late 2011.
  
Through the new MyFord Mobile smartphone app, using the embedded AT&T wireless connection, Ford Focus Electric vehicle owners will have the ability to send and receive data about their car providing command and control of vehicle settings while away from it.
  
“Ford has been at the forefront of developing market leading telematics and infotainment services for its vehicles and we’re thrilled to be a part of this exciting and significant next step with the upcoming Focus Electric,” said Glenn Lurie, president of emerging devices, resale and partnerships, AT&T. “Connecting consumers directly to their electric vehicles in this new and innovative way is going to drive innovative and exciting levels of interaction.”
  
MyFord Mobile technology provides Focus Electric owners in North America with a powerful tool to stay connected, monitor and control their vehicle. Through a smartphone app or secure website, MyFord Mobile invites Focus Electric owners to plan trips, monitor the vehicle’s state of charge, receive various alerts for vehicle charging, as well as provides several other features designed to simplify the electric vehicle ownership experience.
  
“With a wireless connection, we’re putting battery charge and vehicle range information, along with an interactive, data-driven trip planning app, directly at the fingertips of our customers,” said Ed Pleet, product and business manager for Ford Connected Services. “This technology will keep drivers connected to vital information, enhancing their electric car ownership experience. The AT&T network is an important part of this equation and we’re pleased to have AT&T on board.”
  
MyFord Mobile will connect through the AT&T network, allowing the car to communicate off-board through standard wireless technology. From an internet connected mobile phone or computer, owners can:
  
  • Find current and projected state of charge information including estimated range and the amount of charge time necessary for additional distances
  •  Program vehicle charging with utility input, allowing the car to start charging immediately or when electricity prices are lowest with the value charging feature, powered by Microsoft
  •  Features powered by MapQuest available on the MyFord smartphone app:
  •  Locate charging stations and get the destination sent to the vehicle
  •  Know if the vehicle can reach a specific charge station from its current location with the current charge level
  •  Create a journey with multiple stops, and determine the likelihood that the car has adequate charge for the full journey
  •  Find the car by creating a route from a mobile phone to the vehicle
  •  Receive alerts if the vehicle isn’t charging when it’s scheduled to, or if charging stops unexpectedly due to a power outage, plug removal or other event
  •  Receive alerts during recharge when the vehicle has reached a particular preset charge level or has the ability to reach a particular destination
  •  Engage remote vehicle preconditioning, using grid power to heat or cool the vehicle interior
  •  Remotely lock/unlock doors
  •  Use the built-in GPS system to locate the car
  •  Download performance and system data
  •  Fun ways of understanding your driver behavior, with ratings from ‘Zen’ to ‘Zippy’
  •  Receive information personalized to the driver, depending on which key the driver used
  
How the system works
  
At launch, the MyFord Mobile app will be available for most major smartphones, along with a mobile web application for compatibility with any phone supporting HTML-5 browser-based access, or feature phones with WAP 2.0-supported browsers. The feature also is accessible via a secure Ford website.
  
Owners will use the smartphone to communicate with a cloud-based highly secure server, which stores information provided by the embedded wireless module in Focus Electric. Using a cloud-based architecture ensures users will have up-to-the-minute access to information through the AT&T wireless network
 

Thursday, 24 March 2011

Facebook and the post-privacy age.

So I have rejoined Facebook. Now why would I do such a thing after successfully deleting my Facebook profile before?  And yes, I did say “delete” not “disable”. Well, I've come to terms with the beast that is the western world's favourite social media network and I've come to terms with how I expect to use it and how I expect it to use me.

You see one critical thing you need to remember with Facebook, and I can't remember the source of this quote, but its a good one:  With Facebook you are not the customer you are the product.  Snappy, huh?

Facebook exists not to provide you and I with an outlet for sharing our photos and reconnecting with people we haven't seen in 10 years and then ignoring them but it exists to make money for Mark Zukkerberg and his investors.  How it does this is through targeted advertising and selling off your “personal” data to carefully selected third parties.  And “carefully selected” means anyone who pays for it.  Why is it you cannot delete your profile now, nor even your photos?  Because Facebook own these not you.

If you approach Facebook with eyes wide open to what is going on then you can't really complain about Facebook then doing exactly what Facebook does.  I started out in life from a IT Security perspective as that’s been a big chunk of my job for the last five or more years.  However when Facebook hits back at privacy campaigners this week saying “well what the heck do you expect when you plaster this so-called private data all over the flippin' internet you numpties” (or words to that effect) I have to admit a certain level of sympathy for the devil on this matter.  The Register has neat coverage.

You also have to be a bit savvy.  Facebook would like you to use your real contact details, but they can't force you to. I understand you have to confirm you are at least 14 years old to comply with various rules on child safeguarding but no, I don't want them to have my real date of birth as much as I don't want them to have my real bank account number and mother's maiden name.  Meh, maybe I'm paranoid but that doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. 

Again The Register covers why I'm twitchy about this, giving unspecified third parties access to my address and phone number etc.  And you wonder why Facebook are so damn keen to get you to register your mobile with them?  You wonder why I registered on Facebook with a “burner” mobile?  Ha.  And guess what, despite me marking this (my email address and my gender, which is “male”) as  “Private” some odd glitch in the machine means my public profile has my gender displayed as female and there for the world to see is my mobile number and email address.  Oh, you shouldn't be surprised I registered with a “disposable” email address...

To be honest this was not the reason I dropped off Facebook last time around though.

Now with all this paranoia about Facebook you'd be forgiven for thinking they are the only awesome power for supreme evil in the world.  And you would be wrong.  You see I have reconciled myself to Facebook in part because I am already reconciled to Google.  See we've known Google is an evil leviathan of data snaffling and privacy abuse well before the court rulings against the theft and retention of Wi-Fi data (The Register has a ton of articles on this here, and here, and here, and here - you get the idea, there is a ton of this) with these articles on Google privacy concerns going back to '06 and '04...

Google Chrome, Gmail, Google Search and Google Tool Bar are all spy tools when it comes down to it and most of us are fully acclimatised to that.  I'm a fairly careful person with my “private” data yet during a short Skype session my brother was able to demonstrate how easy it is to pull private data on specific people out of Google.  As I say, I'm careful and I watch my digital footprint but just working from my name and location he was able to get my home address, wife's name and that I have a preschool child at home. Next up was my work address, work phone number, my boss' name, and a couple of company related documents in which I was named.  My work email address, one of my home email addresses, and more. 

I think there are two main groups of people. Those who don't realise how privacy is a myth and those who either flat don't care or have resigned and accepted it.  The noise is made by the people transitioning from the first group to the second. 

Tuesday, 22 March 2011

When eCommerce is made of PHAIL

OK, I try not to be too picky, admittedly not very hard, but I do try.  Sometimes things just get the better of me and my picky-picky nature boils up.

Now eCommerce, that's where you put together a website and allow members of the general public to buy stuff off you. Why you do this is because its easy to get your customers to "self serve" and it means you don't have to do tiresome expensive things like speak to them in person.  Even offshore call centres are more expensive than an unattended website.  You can pass this economy on to your customer in part (and low prices should encourage more sales), and put the other part in your own pocket as a bit of extra margin.

Why do I feel the need to explain this?

Because so many websites I deal with on a regular basis seem not to get this.  If I need to phone, email or use Vulcan telepathy to contact you to get information which is essential to complete the sale then you have flat plain utterly-butterly failed. 

www.thetrainline.com I am looking at you right now.



Imagine you are faced with this situation:: You want to book a ticket to travel from the sunny garden city of Nottingham down to Heathrow and then return another day.  You are recommended a "Super Saver Return" by the eCommerce site.  OK, £61 seems good.  Hell, what kind of a world we live in where sixty quid is a reasonable price for a cattle-class ticket, but I digress.  The beautiful moment comes as you are about to put your credit card details in and it casually comments "This ticket is subject to travel restrictions".

Now in the fantasy world I inhabit what happens next is you click on the words "travel restrictions" and you get a nice little page pop up which explains what the travel restrictions are for a Super Saver Return Ticket.  This is not what happens.  So I try searching the site, browsing the site and screaming "YOU SUCK" for a few minutes.  The best I can come up with is that (and I paraphrase) "Super Saver Return tickets are subject to restrictions as to when they may be used. Please see your ticket for details".  Now excuse me but surely when I have paid my £61 and received my ticket a week later is just a bit late to discover that I cannot travel on my intended return train with the ticket I have bought.  There is a "Chat to an adviser" button but this just caused an error message to be displayed.  This was the point the shouting started.


Now I have traveled on trains enough to know that there are many times I hear the announcement "passengers intending to travel on the return portion of a super saver return ticket should be aware that they are not valid for this service" so I know that the sort of trains I like to travel on are usually not allowed.  Even Google could not help me as National Rail and other such sites all offer veiled advice about same day super savers only being valid for departures before 0:30 a.m. the following day.

In the end I was forced to phone their 10p a minute service line, where after 4 attempts at navigating my way through their call-tree system I was finally routed to a helpful chappy somewhere the other side of the world who was finally able to help me despite my lack of a booking reference number (no, I'm not actually booking until I know I can use the frikkin ticket).


So, the smooth, simple easy process of booking a return train ticket was turned into 20 minutes of abject misery and technorage because of a really simple and to my mind pretty obvious omission of key information needed to make a decision on the suitability of the product offered for sale.  People, don't make these basic errors.  It makes your customers want to shop elsewhere.  When designing websites for customer use you need to think like a customer and think what the customer will need.  If your customers have to leave your site to find that info you risk losing them, if they have to phone you to find it you add cost to your sale.

If there is one other important lesson to be learned from all this it is simply this, Super Saver Open Return Tickets may be used on any off-peak return journey where a peak time is defined as before 9:30am or after 15:30 and before 18:30.

Monday, 21 March 2011

Saab fan gets top job through blog...

An interesting story is reproduced in the Register regarding the tale of a Tasmanian fellow who started a blog about Saab as a regular guy fan site type thing.  Saab like it so much they have given him an exec job.  Readallaboutit here....

I'm reminded of the time when NTL bought out NThellworld, a "fan" site of NTLworld.  Different story there though.

Thursday, 17 March 2011

Browser Wars: Microsoft's IE9 Salvo

Well the production IE9 is out and anyone who really cared has been on the Beta or RC for weeks or months anyway. If you want a serious technical debate about the whys and wherefores of browser choice then I think you know better than to come here for that.  What you get here is opinion!  And its pure, raw, undisguised opinion.  I like to think of it as “informed comment”.  What you think of it is up to you.

The thing I find interesting about the browser wars is how low key its all become.  There was a point at which fanbois of whichever browser was soup-du-jour would be screaming from the rooftops about this feature or that and the relative security of each, about open source components or proprietary standards.

Seems to have gone pretty quiet.  Even the annual browser hacking contests don't provide the flurry of excitement they perhaps aught to.  Every now and again you get a new release of one of the “big three” browsers and these seem to be met with a decreasing level of interest.  This is very odd as more and more applications are delivered through the web now (home user and business) and more and more sites are all about RIA, Web 2.0, and security is a big issue online as we do more business, banking, shopping, etc. in cyberspace.  So really the browser is more important now than its ever been – down to the fact Google's own OS is basically just a browser...

So IE9 is out and IE9 is actually good. It appears quicker and more reliable than IE8. It has a lot of the things about Chrome which I like. There’s a lot of stuff “under the hood” which is goodness. I'll leave it at that, it gives the impression I know what that’s all about...

The best thing about IE9 is that it doesn't work on Windows XP.  Much like IE6 Microsoft needs to kill WinXP dead, kill it to death and burn it with fire.  XP is pretty much a reworked W2K.  This is technology more than a decade old.  For some reason there are a lot of IT pros who just can't move on.  I thought IT peeps were supposed to be forward looking and tech-savvy yet when it comes to OS upgrades I've never met such a bunch of luddites. 

I hear out there in blogland that IE9 is PHAIL because it doesn't run on XP.  Sorry, dude, you are PHAIL because you are still running XP.

Perhaps one of the reasons browser wars are cooled down now is that most people have twigged you don't need to have just one browser.  On my office PC I have Windows7 and it runs IE9 and Firefox.  I use different browser for different reasons.  We have a lot of SharePoint and Exchange so IE is my default browser.  It just works better that way.  I installed Firefox as some sites weren't IE9 ready and I liked IE9 to be using it as my default browser from the Beta.  At home I use Chrome as my PC is a little slow and Chrome is quick.  I also have IE8 and Firefox on there.  I need to upgrade to Win7, IE9, etc. on that box.  IE9 might even replace Chrome as Chrome don't play nice with other browsers and IE9 seems as quick as Chrome....  For balance I have Ubuntu on a laptop and Firefox on that.  So yeah, you can run whatever combo of browsers you like which is why some of the market share data on browsers can be a bit iffy.  After all, Firefox has 100% of the market where I am.  This despite the fact I use Chrome and IE more.

Go figure. 

Anyway, if you are committed to IE as a browser then IE9 is just another reason to ditch XP and upgrade to a modern damn OS.

Friday, 11 March 2011

"Taking the fun out of motoring"

There has been a general opinion in the world of forums, blogs and general banter of late regarding the removal of the “fun” element of motoring.  This is something which has been gently becoming the default attitude on motoring by most people you speak to now.

The argument is that this is all the fault of “the man”.  The problem, according to many I speak to, is that “the man” is determined to remove every last bit of fun from our lives and quite high on his list is the fear that we Brits may actually enjoy driving our cars.


There are two sub-groups in the proponents of this argument.  Firstly the folks too young to remember this supposed golden era of motoring which occurred at some fairly unspecified point in the past but must have been before they passed their driving tests, and the second group are those elderly curmudgeons like myself who have been there, seen that and of course it was all much, much better “in my day”.



I'm going to ignore the youngsters in this, they are just buying into the same nostalgia packaging that my parents' generation used to convince me as a kid that the 60s were the swingingest time and that I had missed out by growing up in the 80s.

The grumpy old man perspective is part fashion (hense all the TV programmes, books, newspaper columns and the like devoted to “grumpies”) and part a feature of, well, just growing up.  Or at least growing old.  See when you are young, you are full of energy, drive, enthusiasm and this great desire to see all the wonders that the world has to offer.  Then you get to 30 or so and you realise that you've pretty much seen the great diversity and that although you haven't really seen it ALL, what of it that there is left unseen is just more of the same with a slight iterative variation.  Cars, bikes, booze, women, music, comedians, movies, and so on and so on.  Yes, you appreciate them, yes you may be enthusiastic still, but the edge is gone.  Some try to maintain the buzz they had in their 20s or whenever by just ratcheting up the level and going to a wild excess.  But that really isn't sustainable.



So we end up looking back at our 20s as a golden era and telling ourselves and everybody else who'll give us the time of day that those were the days my friend, we thought they'd never end.  And seriously, Mary Hopkins was cool once.  Or so I am told.  So when some old git like me is telling you that the fun has been taken out of motoring what they mean really is that they are old, and getting grumpy.  One of the big things you have to ask is what the fun is which has been taken out of it.  And for many people its the having a laugh with your mates, tear-arseing about, chasing girls and getting in a few scrapes, laughing it off and then going clubbing.  Or whatever.  Honestly, my life was just like a Fast & The Furious movie, but with Capris, Mantas, Cortinas and so forth.  That bird just don't fly when you are 40.

There is another way of looking at this and its one which I have been noticing myself over the passing years.  Motoring in the UK is becoming more tiresome, yes, and not just because of the additional mileage on my bones.  But its not the price of petrol, the price of insurance, the encroaching regulation of IVA/BIVA and laws to make you insure your car whenever it is taxed.  Its not even the speed camera.  Its traffic.  To be honest most of my driving I am lucky to get anywhere near the speed limit let alone to be worrying about speed cameras.  There are quite simply way more cars on the road now than there were 10, 20 or 30 years ago.  If you then equate “the fun of motoring” to be linked directly and proportionally to your ability to drive really quickly on public roads without getting held up by other traffic then, yup, you are screwed.



There are plenty of folks pouring scorn on younger car enthusiasts who modify their cars – not to go faster or handle better – but to be more “pimped out”.  Styling, accessories, audio and entertainment equipment seems to be the order of the day.  But if you can only insure a 1.2 litre Vauxhall Corsa then what IS performance?  If you live in the urban sprawl and can never get to more than 40 MPH, what does performance matter?  One hot rodders' adage I like is “its not how fast you go, its how you go fast” and for British metropolitan motorists its not even about “fast”.



You have two choices really.  Redefine what fun is by enjoying owning a car which is cool, and is still cool even if its stuck doing 20 MPH in a school zone, or crawling up to roadworks on your congested commute, or you do something about the congestion.  Seems to me that half the cars on the roads are driven by people who have no interest in actually driving, they just do it because its the default way to get from where they are to where they need to be.  Restructuring how non-enthusiasts get about would certainly free up some road space for the rest of us.



I don't see that happening.  Any attempt to improve public transport is viewed as being an opportunity for the government to chuck a pile of money down a well and any attempt to discourage folks from “unnecessary” use of their cars is reviled as a new form of Stalinism.

So that takes us back to the point about redefining fun.  I've moved on from thinking love is being drunk and trying to persuade some equally drunk lass to come back to my place, or at the very least up an alley and behind some bins.  Equally I have to say I don't have to drive at ten tenths every minute I'm behind the wheel, I get a kick from when people point or wave or photograph my car, from the fact that just driving it is cool.  For ten tenths there is still the rac

Metropolitan Fire Truck

Spotted in the ads on Hemmings is this neat Nash (nee Austin) Metropolitan fire truck.  I really get a kick out of these kinds of conversions on vehicles so exceptionally unsuited for the task that you have to wonder if they were a purposeful novelty when built new.


The ad for it has no story.  I assume from the "Junior fire dept" logos that it was used to promote fire safety in schools or something.  If anyone knows, let me know...

Wednesday, 9 March 2011

Ford's Fully-connected Focus

As regular readers of the blog will know I am a bit of a fan of connectivity in cars.  I want Audiogalaxy in my dash. I want my tweets read out to me.  I want internet radio on the move.  I want seamless integration with the technology I use when my backside is resting behind the wheel and when my backside is resting behind the keyboard.  I am a geek on wheels I guess.
Not a pretty dash, but fully connected.
Ford have announced their Sync product for the UK market now. This is an integration tool
for the connected automobile.  Basically an electronic control hub in the car links with your iPhone, Blackberry or Android phone to integrate these with the Ford inbuilt entertainment and navigation functions.  Link it with an OBD reader as well and I'll be smiling.  Smiling is not what everyone will be doing though.  The feature which automatically calls the police if you have an accident may seem a little “spy in the cab” for most!


RCA ports for AV, USB and data cards
Ford have bundled voice control (which is the bit they seem to be hawking the hardest) as
well as a host of media ports - a couple of USB ports, Bluetooth, an SD card slot and RCA jacks for AV hookups – to ensure your media requirements are met. The Sync system also provides you with a Wi-Fi hotspot in the car which either comes from tethering your mobile or alternatively through an optional extra dongle.
The UI - its Microsoft based BTW.

No word on pricing as yet, and the first car to get Sync is the Focus.

Tuesday, 8 March 2011

Reyland 6 litre Firenza project

I don't know how many people following this blog are also members of the Overclockers forum but there is a spectacular HC series Vauxhall Firenza (flat front) which has been outfitted with the serious Chevy 6 litre LS motor. 


My words cannot do this one justice.  Go see for yourself HERE

The only words I can think of are "muthahuggin awesome" - forget ramraiding Halfords in a Corsa, this is how to modify a Vauxhall...

Wednesday, 2 March 2011

Bad science. Is there any other kind now?

I'm a little behind on my bile so these two stories are not quite the cutting edge of the news that they were last week, but they are current enough to use as further examples of bad science and woolly thinking in the media. Or rather woolly thinking on what constitutes a meaningful study.

The first item is the Which? report on organic food. This was widely reported middle of last week. Which? concluded that there is no value in organic foods based on its testing of three foodstuffs which include potatoes and tomatoes, these being the two of the three which “prove” their case. The “proof” being that non-organic potatoes have more vitamin C than organic potatoes and that non-organic tomatoes taste better than organic ones. Which when stated this way does seem damning. Until you consider a few things. Most consumers who buy organic do so because of the reduction in pesticides and intensive farming methods which the organic movement believe are harmful to the environment in general. That is a completely different argument which I don't propose to get into here but it is one which Which? is not addressing. At the risk of a pun its not comparing apples with apples.
The principle behind the organic movement is that people buy organic because they think they are saving the planet. Vitamin C content has nothing to do with it.

The next thing you have to ask is how were the varieties selected? Were they the same strains and were they grown in a comparative manner? Some types of potato may naturally contain more vitamin C than others anyway and the difference is in a completely different reason than organic vs. not. I'm not sure vitamin C levels in potatoes is really part of the deal anyway. I've read a fair number of people say we get too much vitamin C anyway, the excess just passes right through you. If you are concerned about your vitamin C levels then rather than mess about which potatoes you eat you could always try an orange or something...

As for the “tastes better” argument – this is matter of opinion and will have all manner of variation based on age, personal preference, ethnic background and whatever. Personally I like Cadbury chocolate better than Green & Blacks. So is dairy milk “the best” or even “better” chocolate? Probably not. But I'm sure I could get a taste test panel together which proves it. This was just another meaningless report in a sea of “diversion” news articles to take your mind off the conflict in Libya or the death toll in Christchurch.

The one which really got my goat was an article on Radio 4 in which the correspondent rolled out an allegation that IT had failed to reduce paper in the modern business. There was much scoffing over “the paperless office” and so forth. Now you can pick on the organic vegetables all you like but you start on “progress” and “IT innovation” and such in your thinly veiled pro-Ludd agenda and I am raised in ire.

You see what they had done was to take a 10 year viewpoint and say that because paper consumption in the UK has increased something like 1% in that time that the IT industry has failed to make an impact on paper consumption. Again on the face of it this seems a statement which has a factual base. The thing which is the first concern is that the BBC think a 1% increase is a statistically relevant increase. For the most part that is “margin of error” for an unchanged volume.

Next thing is that they are not talking about the paper used in offices, nor even “industry” or the whole commercial sector. That is all use of paper including as a packaging material and magazines and even toilet paper. So in packaging we have moved away from polystyrene and polypropylene and all those nasty materials and now most packaging is some form of recycled paper based stuff. Now consider the fact that the population of the UK has grown, and probably by significantly more than 1% over ten years. That's an increase in the noses to blow, bottoms to wipe, and an increase in the number of items in packaging to be bought. Even nappies are made from paper based product. So I don't have the real numbers to hand, and I would venture to suggest that the people at the BBC who produced that programme didn't either so my opinion is as valid as theirs!

My opinion is that the facts support the fact that if paper consumption in the UK has gone up by a mere 1% in the last decade and that the uses for paper in the consumer market place have increased in real terms it must mean that paper consumption in the office environment has been reduced.
We don't have a paperless office. We don't have a waste-free world. I have to say I get 1000 times more junk email than I get junk in the real mail. The volume of catalogues and flyers and so forth I get is radically reduced. Most of my bills are online now (both for business and at home) so IT has reduced paper consumption.

Maybe we can do an assessment of how many journalists have based articles for print or radio on opinion and their own bias and presented this as fact using flawed logic, poor research and a total misunderstanding of the need for real research methods. I suspect the trend is upwards. Anyone got any figures? Made up ones will do.  So long as it supports my hypothesis I'm not going to question them.